E-Kıyasla
DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1983 Mazda 626 vs 1983 Audi 100 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi 100

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

53.25–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 626SpecificationAudi 100
MazdaMakeAudi
626Model100
1983Model year1983
—Body typeSedan
4+1Seats5
—Doors4

Performance

Mazda 626SpecificationAudi 100
10,7 s0–100 km/h14,0 s
185 km/hTop speed173 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1986 cc
101 HPPower87 HP
155 NmTorque172 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 626SpecificationAudi 100
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank80 lt
10,2 ltUrban consumption—
7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
8,8 ltAverage consumption7,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 626SpecificationAudi 100
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/70 R14Tyre size185/70 R14

Dimensions

Mazda 626SpecificationAudi 100
—Length4793 mm
—Width1814 mm
—Height1422 mm
1190 KgWeight1250 Kg
2510 mmWheelbase2687 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1983 Mazda 626 and 1983 Audi 100 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi 100 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

1983 Audi 100VS1983 Mazda 626Audi 100 vs Mazda 6261983 and 1983 model years1986 Audi 80VS1983 Mazda 626Audi 80 vs Mazda 6261986 and 1983 model years1988 Opel SenatorVS1983 Mazda 626Opel Senator vs Mazda 6261988 and 1983 model years1988 Audi 90VS1983 Mazda 626Audi 90 vs Mazda 6261988 and 1983 model years

Comments are loading…