DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1983 Audi 100 vs 1983 Mazda 626 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi 100

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

54.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi 100SpecificationMazda 626
AudiMakeMazda
100Model626
1983Model year1983
SedanBody type—
5Seats4+1
4Doors—

Performance

Audi 100SpecificationMazda 626
14,0 s0–100 km/h10,7 s
173 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1986 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
87 HPPower101 HP
172 NmTorque155 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Audi 100SpecificationMazda 626
DieselFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank50 lt
—Urban consumption10,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7 lt
7,2 ltAverage consumption8,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Audi 100SpecificationMazda 626
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/70 R14Tyre size185/70 R14

Dimensions

Audi 100SpecificationMazda 626
4793 mmLength—
1814 mmWidth—
1422 mmHeight—
1250 KgWeight1190 Kg
2687 mmWheelbase2510 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1983 Audi 100 and 1983 Mazda 626 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi 100 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…