DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1988 Audi 90 vs 1983 Mazda 626 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi 90

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

54.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi 90SpecificationMazda 626
AudiMakeMazda
90Model626
1988Model year1983
SedanBody type—
5Seats4+1
4Doors—

Performance

Audi 90SpecificationMazda 626
14,6 s0–100 km/h10,7 s
174 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1588 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
80 HPPower101 HP
155 NmTorque155 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Audi 90SpecificationMazda 626
DieselFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank50 lt
6,9 ltUrban consumption10,2 lt
3,8 ltExtra-urban consumption7 lt
5,3 ltAverage consumption8,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Audi 90SpecificationMazda 626
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/70 R14Tyre size185/70 R14
YesABS—

Dimensions

Audi 90SpecificationMazda 626
4393 mmLength—
1695 mmWidth—
1397 mmHeight—
1090 KgWeight1190 Kg
2546 mmWheelbase2510 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1988 Audi 90 and 1983 Mazda 626 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi 90 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…