DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Mazda 626 vs 1996 Renault Megane Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 626

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

53.25–52.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeRenault
626ModelMegane
1996Model year1996
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

10,1 s0–100 km/h12,3 s
191 km/hTop speed183 km/h
1840 ccEngine displacement1870 cc
105 HPPower98 HP
155 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption6,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,4 lt
7,7 ltAverage consumption5,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R15Tyre size185/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4695 mmLength4440 mm
1750 mmWidth1699 mm
1390 mmHeight1420 mm
1180 KgWeight1135 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2580 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Mazda 626 and 1996 Renault Megane approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 626 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…