DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Seat Alhambra vs 1996 Mazda 626 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 626

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

52.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SeatMakeMazda
AlhambraModel626
1996Model year1996
MinivanBody typeHatchback
7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

16,4 s0–100 km/h10,1 s
172 km/hTop speed191 km/h
1896 ccEngine displacement1840 cc
110 HPPower105 HP
235 NmTorque155 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank60 lt
8,6 ltUrban consumption—
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption7,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/60 R16Tyre size185/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4617 mmLength4695 mm
1810 mmWidth1750 mm
1728 mmHeight1390 mm
1754 KgWeight1180 Kg
2835 mmWheelbase2610 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Seat Alhambra and 1996 Mazda 626 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 626 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…