1996 • Fiat
Croma
Fiat Croma 1996Overall Score52.25/100
1996 Fiat Croma vs 1996 Mazda 626 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1996 • Mazda
626
Mazda 626 1.8 (105 Hp) 1996Overall Score53.25/100
WINNER
Mazda 626
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
52.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Fiat CromaSpecificationMazda 626
FiatMakeMazda
CromaModel626
1996Model year1996
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Fiat CromaSpecificationMazda 626
12,5 s0–100 km/h10,1 s
180 km/hTop speed191 km/h
1929 ccEngine displacement1840 cc
94 HPPower105 HP
200 NmTorque155 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Fiat CromaSpecificationMazda 626
DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank60 lt
6 ltUrban consumption—
3,9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,5 ltAverage consumption7,7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Fiat CromaSpecificationMazda 626
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/70 R14Tyre size185/65 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Fiat CromaSpecificationMazda 626
4520 mmLength4695 mm
1760 mmWidth1750 mm
1430 mmHeight1390 mm
1240 KgWeight1180 Kg
2660 mmWheelbase2610 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1996 Fiat Croma and 1996 Mazda 626 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda 626 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…