2009 • Mazda
6
Mazda 6 2.5i (170 Hp) 2009Overall Score68.5/100
2009 Mazda 6 vs 2009 Ford Ranger Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2009 • Ford
Ranger
Ford Ranger 2.5 TDCi (143 Hp) 2009Overall Score67.75/100
WINNER
Mazda 6
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda 6SpecificationFord Ranger
MazdaMakeFord
6ModelRanger
2009Model year2009
EstateBody typePick-up
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Mazda 6SpecificationFord Ranger
8,4 s0–100 km/h—
218 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2488 ccEngine displacement2499 cc
170 HPPower143 HP
226 NmTorque330 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda 6SpecificationFord Ranger
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
64 ltFuel tank70 lt
11,2 ltUrban consumption—
6,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
8,1 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda 6SpecificationFord Ranger
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears5
—Tyre size235/75 R15; 245/70 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda 6SpecificationFord Ranger
4765 mmLength5075 mm
1795 mmWidth1805 mm
1490 mmHeight1745 mm
1485 KgWeight—
2725 mmWheelbase3000 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2009 Mazda 6 and 2009 Ford Ranger approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda 6 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…