2009 • Ford
Ranger
Ford Ranger 2.5 TDCi (143 Hp) 2009Overall Score67.75/100
2009 Ford Ranger vs 2009 Mazda 6 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2009 • Mazda
6
Mazda 6 2.5i (170 Hp) 2009Overall Score68.5/100
WINNER
Mazda 6
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford RangerSpecificationMazda 6
FordMakeMazda
RangerModel6
2009Model year2009
Pick-upBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Ford RangerSpecificationMazda 6
—0–100 km/h8,4 s
0 km/hTop speed218 km/h
2499 ccEngine displacement2488 cc
143 HPPower170 HP
330 NmTorque226 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford RangerSpecificationMazda 6
DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank64 lt
—Urban consumption11,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,4 lt
—Average consumption8,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford RangerSpecificationMazda 6
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
235/75 R15; 245/70 R16Tyre size—
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford RangerSpecificationMazda 6
5075 mmLength4765 mm
1805 mmWidth1795 mm
1745 mmHeight1490 mm
—Weight1485 Kg
3000 mmWheelbase2725 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2009 Ford Ranger and 2009 Mazda 6 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda 6 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…