DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Volvo XC70 vs 2009 Mazda 6 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 6

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo XC70SpecificationMazda 6
VolvoMakeMazda
XC70Model6
2009Model year2009
EstateBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Volvo XC70SpecificationMazda 6
9,6 s0–100 km/h8,4 s
0 km/hTop speed218 km/h
2400 ccEngine displacement2488 cc
175 HPPower170 HP
420 NmTorque226 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo XC70SpecificationMazda 6
DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank64 lt
8,0 ltUrban consumption11,2 lt
4,9 ltExtra-urban consumption6,4 lt
6,0 ltAverage consumption8,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo XC70SpecificationMazda 6
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears6
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo XC70SpecificationMazda 6
4838 mmLength4765 mm
1861 mmWidth1795 mm
1604 mmHeight1490 mm
1742 KgWeight1485 Kg
2815 mmWheelbase2725 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Volvo XC70 and 2009 Mazda 6 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 6 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…