DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Mazda 6 vs 2009 Citroen C6 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 6

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 6SpecificationCitroen C6
MazdaMakeCitroen
6ModelC6
2009Model year2009
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Mazda 6SpecificationCitroen C6
8,4 s0–100 km/h10,3 s
218 km/hTop speed217 km/h
2488 ccEngine displacement2179 cc
170 HPPower170 HP
226 NmTorque370 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 6SpecificationCitroen C6
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
64 ltFuel tank72 lt
11,2 ltUrban consumption8,7 lt
6,4 ltExtra-urban consumption5,4 lt
8,1 ltAverage consumption6,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 6SpecificationCitroen C6
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size225/55 R17; 245/45 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 6SpecificationCitroen C6
4765 mmLength4908 mm
1795 mmWidth1860 mm
1490 mmHeight1464 mm
1485 KgWeight1821 Kg
2725 mmWheelbase2900 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Mazda 6 and 2009 Citroen C6 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 6 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…