DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Mazda 6 vs 2012 Volvo V50 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 6

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 6SpecificationVolvo V50
MazdaMakeVolvo
6ModelV50
2012Model year2012
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

Mazda 6SpecificationVolvo V50
7,8 s0–100 km/h7,3 s
223 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2488 ccEngine displacement2521 cc
192 HPPower230 HP
256 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 6SpecificationVolvo V50
PetrolFuel typePetrol
62 ltFuel tank62 lt
8,5 ltUrban consumption13,5 lt
5,0 ltExtra-urban consumption6,5 lt
6,3 ltAverage consumption9,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 6SpecificationVolvo V50
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 6SpecificationVolvo V50
4865 mmLength4522 mm
1840 mmWidth1845 mm
1450 mmHeight1457 mm
1360 KgWeight1504 Kg
2830 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Mazda 6 and 2012 Volvo V50 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 6 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…