DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Jeep Compass vs 2012 Mazda 6 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 6

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Jeep CompassSpecificationMazda 6
JeepMakeMazda
CompassModel6
2012Model year2012
SUVBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Jeep CompassSpecificationMazda 6
10,90 s0–100 km/h7,8 s
201 km/hTop speed223 km/h
2143 ccEngine displacement2488 cc
163 HPPower192 HP
320 NmTorque256 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Jeep CompassSpecificationMazda 6
DieselFuel typePetrol
51 ltFuel tank62 lt
7,9 ltUrban consumption8,5 lt
5,9 ltExtra-urban consumption5,0 lt
6,6 ltAverage consumption6,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Jeep CompassSpecificationMazda 6
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
215/60 R17Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Jeep CompassSpecificationMazda 6
4448 mmLength4865 mm
1812 mmWidth1840 mm
1718 mmHeight1450 mm
1680 KgWeight1360 Kg
2635 mmWheelbase2830 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Jeep Compass and 2012 Mazda 6 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 6 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…