2012 • Mazda
6
Mazda 6 2.5 SKYACTIV-G (192 Hp) 2012Overall Score68.5/100
2012 Mazda 6 vs 2012 Jeep Compass Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2012 • Jeep
Compass
Jeep Compass 2.2 CRD (163 Hp) 2012Overall Score67.75/100
WINNER
Mazda 6
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda 6SpecificationJeep Compass
MazdaMakeJeep
6ModelCompass
2012Model year2012
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Mazda 6SpecificationJeep Compass
7,8 s0–100 km/h10,90 s
223 km/hTop speed201 km/h
2488 ccEngine displacement2143 cc
192 HPPower163 HP
256 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda 6SpecificationJeep Compass
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
62 ltFuel tank51 lt
8,5 ltUrban consumption7,9 lt
5,0 ltExtra-urban consumption5,9 lt
6,3 ltAverage consumption6,6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Mazda 6SpecificationJeep Compass
4865 mmLength4448 mm
1840 mmWidth1812 mm
1450 mmHeight1718 mm
1360 KgWeight1680 Kg
2830 mmWheelbase2635 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 Mazda 6 and 2012 Jeep Compass approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda 6 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…