2003 • Mazda
6
Mazda 6 2.3 (166 Hp) 2003Overall Score65.5/100
2003 Mazda 6 vs 2003 Land Rover Freelander Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Land Rover
Freelander
Land Rover Freelander 2.5 i V6 24V (177 Hp) 2003Overall Score65.25/100
WINNER
Mazda 6
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
65.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda 6SpecificationLand Rover Freelander
MazdaMakeLand Rover
6ModelFreelander
2003Model year2003
EstateBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors3
Performance
Mazda 6SpecificationLand Rover Freelander
9,2 s0–100 km/h11,1 s
209 km/hTop speed182 km/h
2261 ccEngine displacement2497 cc
166 HPPower177 HP
207 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda 6SpecificationLand Rover Freelander
PetrolFuel typePetrol
64 ltFuel tank60 lt
12,4 ltUrban consumption17,2 lt
7,2 ltExtra-urban consumption9,7 lt
9,1 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda 6SpecificationLand Rover Freelander
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears4
215/45 R17 VTyre size215/65 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda 6SpecificationLand Rover Freelander
4700 mmLength4433 mm
1780 mmWidth1809 mm
1480 mmHeight1709 mm
1390 KgWeight1550 Kg
2675 mmWheelbase2557 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Mazda 6 and 2003 Land Rover Freelander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda 6 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…