DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 SsangYong Rexton vs 2003 Mazda 6 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

SsangYong Rexton

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

66.25–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SsangYongMakeMazda
RextonModel6
2003Model year2003
Off-road vehicleBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,2 s
170 km/hTop speed209 km/h
2295 ccEngine displacement2261 cc
143 HPPower166 HP
209 NmTorque207 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank64 lt
15,8 ltUrban consumption12,4 lt
9,4 ltExtra-urban consumption7,2 lt
11,7 ltAverage consumption9,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
235/70 R16Tyre size215/45 R17 V
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4720 mmLength4700 mm
1870 mmWidth1780 mm
1760 mmHeight1480 mm
1815 KgWeight1390 Kg
2828 mmWheelbase2675 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 SsangYong Rexton and 2003 Mazda 6 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, SsangYong Rexton leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…