DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Land Rover Freelander vs 2003 Mazda 6 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 6

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

65.25–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeMazda
FreelanderModel6
2003Model year2003
Off-road vehicleBody typeEstate
5Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

11,1 s0–100 km/h9,2 s
182 km/hTop speed209 km/h
2497 ccEngine displacement2261 cc
177 HPPower166 HP
240 NmTorque207 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank64 lt
17,2 ltUrban consumption12,4 lt
9,7 ltExtra-urban consumption7,2 lt
—Average consumption9,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
215/65 R16Tyre size215/45 R17 V
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4433 mmLength4700 mm
1809 mmWidth1780 mm
1709 mmHeight1480 mm
1550 KgWeight1390 Kg
2557 mmWheelbase2675 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Land Rover Freelander and 2003 Mazda 6 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 6 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…