2010 • Mazda
6
Mazda 6 2.2 CD (129 Hp) 2010Overall Score54.25/100
2010 Mazda 6 vs 2012 Morgan 3 Wheeler Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2012 • Morgan
3 Wheeler
Morgan 3 Wheeler 2.0 V2 (82 Hp) 2012Overall Score53.25/100
WINNER
Mazda 6
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
54.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda 6SpecificationMorgan 3 Wheeler
MazdaMakeMorgan
6Model3 Wheeler
2010Model year2012
EstateBody typeRoadster
5Seats2
5Doors—
Performance
Mazda 6SpecificationMorgan 3 Wheeler
10,9 s0–100 km/h6,0 s
193 km/hTop speed185 km/h
2184 ccEngine displacement1983 cc
129 HPPower82 HP
0 NmTorque140 Nm
4Cylinders2
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda 6SpecificationMorgan 3 Wheeler
DieselFuel typePetrol
64 ltFuel tank42 lt
6,6 ltUrban consumption13,4 lt
4,4 ltExtra-urban consumption6,3 lt
5,2 ltAverage consumption9,3 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Mazda 6SpecificationMorgan 3 Wheeler
4765 mmLength3225 mm
1795 mmWidth1720 mm
1490 mmHeight1000 mm
1565 KgWeight525 Kg
2725 mmWheelbase—
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2010 Mazda 6 and 2012 Morgan 3 Wheeler approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda 6 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…