2012 • Morgan
3 Wheeler
Morgan 3 Wheeler 2.0 V2 (82 Hp) 2012Overall Score53.25/100
2012 Morgan 3 Wheeler vs 2010 Mazda 6 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2010 • Mazda
6
Mazda 6 2.2 CD (129 Hp) 2010Overall Score54.25/100
WINNER
Mazda 6
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
53.25–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Morgan 3 WheelerSpecificationMazda 6
MorganMakeMazda
3 WheelerModel6
2012Model year2010
RoadsterBody typeEstate
2Seats5
—Doors5
Performance
Morgan 3 WheelerSpecificationMazda 6
6,0 s0–100 km/h10,9 s
185 km/hTop speed193 km/h
1983 ccEngine displacement2184 cc
82 HPPower129 HP
140 NmTorque0 Nm
2Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Morgan 3 WheelerSpecificationMazda 6
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
42 ltFuel tank64 lt
13,4 ltUrban consumption6,6 lt
6,3 ltExtra-urban consumption4,4 lt
9,3 ltAverage consumption5,2 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Morgan 3 WheelerSpecificationMazda 6
3225 mmLength4765 mm
1720 mmWidth1795 mm
1000 mmHeight1490 mm
525 KgWeight1565 Kg
—Wheelbase2725 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 Morgan 3 Wheeler and 2010 Mazda 6 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda 6 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSCitroen Jumpy vs Morgan 3 Wheeler2012 and 2012 model years
VSFord Tourneo Connect vs Morgan 3 Wheeler2012 and 2012 model years
VSVolkswagen Caddy vs Morgan 3 Wheeler2012 and 2012 model years
VSVolvo S40 vs Morgan 3 Wheeler2012 and 2012 model years
VSCitroen Berlingo vs Morgan 3 Wheeler2012 and 2012 model yearsComments are loading…