DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Volvo V50 vs 2010 Mazda 6 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 6

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

53.5–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo V50SpecificationMazda 6
VolvoMakeMazda
V50Model6
2009Model year2010
EstateBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Volvo V50SpecificationMazda 6
11,0 s0–100 km/h10,9 s
0 km/hTop speed193 km/h
1798 ccEngine displacement2184 cc
125 HPPower129 HP
165 NmTorque0 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo V50SpecificationMazda 6
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank64 lt
10,1 ltUrban consumption6,6 lt
5,7 ltExtra-urban consumption4,4 lt
7,3 ltAverage consumption5,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo V50SpecificationMazda 6
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain—
5Gears6
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo V50SpecificationMazda 6
4522 mmLength4765 mm
1845 mmWidth1795 mm
1457 mmHeight1490 mm
1383 KgWeight1565 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2725 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Volvo V50 and 2010 Mazda 6 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 6 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…