DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Mazda 6 vs 2010 Mahindra Thar Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 6

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

54.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeMahindra
6ModelThar
2010Model year2010
EstateBody typeCabriolet, SUV
5Seats7
5Doors3

Performance

10,9 s0–100 km/h11,0 s
193 km/hTop speed150 km/h
2184 ccEngine displacement2523 cc
129 HPPower64 HP
0 NmTorque182 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
64 ltFuel tank45 lt
6,6 ltUrban consumption—
4,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,2 ltAverage consumption5,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

—DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears5
—Tyre size185/85 R16
YesABS—

Dimensions

4765 mmLength3760 mm
1795 mmWidth1640 mm
1490 mmHeight1904 mm
1565 KgWeight—
2725 mmWheelbase2430 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Mazda 6 and 2010 Mahindra Thar approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 6 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…