2010 • Mazda
6
Mazda 6 2.2 CD (129 Hp) 2010Overall Score54.25/100
2010 Mazda 6 vs 2008 Daewoo Rezzo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2008 • Daewoo
Rezzo
Daewoo Rezzo 2.0 i (128 Hp) 2008Overall Score53.5/100
WINNER
Mazda 6
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
54.25–53.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda 6SpecificationDaewoo Rezzo
MazdaMakeDaewoo
6ModelRezzo
2010Model year2008
EstateBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Mazda 6SpecificationDaewoo Rezzo
10,9 s0–100 km/h12,4 s
193 km/hTop speed104 km/h
2184 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
129 HPPower128 HP
0 NmTorque176 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda 6SpecificationDaewoo Rezzo
DieselFuel typePetrol
64 ltFuel tank60 lt
6,6 ltUrban consumption15,1 lt
4,4 ltExtra-urban consumption8,2 lt
5,2 ltAverage consumption10,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Mazda 6SpecificationDaewoo Rezzo
4765 mmLength4350 mm
1795 mmWidth1750 mm
1490 mmHeight1580 mm
1565 KgWeight1392 Kg
2725 mmWheelbase2600 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2010 Mazda 6 and 2008 Daewoo Rezzo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda 6 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…