DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Mazda 6 vs 2003 Volkswagen Passat Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volkswagen Passat

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 6 points.

59.5–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeVolkswagen
6ModelPassat
2003Model year2003
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

9,9 s0–100 km/h9,2 s
202 km/hTop speed223 km/h
1999 ccEngine displacement1781 cc
141 HPPower150 HP
181 NmTorque210 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
64 ltFuel tank62 lt
11,8 ltUrban consumption10,7 lt
6,6 ltExtra-urban consumption6,3 lt
8,5 ltAverage consumption9,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15 VTyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4700 mmLength4670 mm
1780 mmWidth1740 mm
1480 mmHeight1460 mm
1335 KgWeight1280 Kg
2675 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Mazda 6 and 2003 Volkswagen Passat approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volkswagen Passat leads the E-Kıyasla score by 6 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…