DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 MG ZS vs 2003 Mazda 6 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZS

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MG ZSSpecificationMazda 6
MGMakeMazda
ZSModel6
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

MG ZSSpecificationMazda 6
9,5 s0–100 km/h9,9 s
193 km/hTop speed202 km/h
1994 ccEngine displacement1999 cc
113 HPPower141 HP
260 NmTorque181 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

MG ZSSpecificationMazda 6
DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank64 lt
7,8 ltUrban consumption11,8 lt
4,3 ltExtra-urban consumption6,6 lt
—Average consumption8,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

MG ZSSpecificationMazda 6
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/50 R16Tyre size195/65 R15 V
YesABSYes

Dimensions

MG ZSSpecificationMazda 6
4520 mmLength4700 mm
1700 mmWidth1780 mm
1390 mmHeight1480 mm
1225 KgWeight1335 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2675 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 MG ZS and 2003 Mazda 6 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZS leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…