DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Chevrolet Cavalier vs 2003 Mazda 6 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Cavalier

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ChevroletMakeMazda
CavalierModel6
2003Model year2003
CoupeBody typeEstate
5Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

9,0 s0–100 km/h9,9 s
180 km/hTop speed202 km/h
2198 ccEngine displacement1999 cc
141 HPPower141 HP
203 NmTorque181 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
53 ltFuel tank64 lt
9,4 ltUrban consumption11,8 lt
7,1 ltExtra-urban consumption6,6 lt
8,1 ltAverage consumption8,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size195/65 R15 V
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4580 mmLength4700 mm
1712 mmWidth1780 mm
1351 mmHeight1480 mm
1215 KgWeight1335 Kg
2645 mmWheelbase2675 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Chevrolet Cavalier and 2003 Mazda 6 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Cavalier leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…