DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Mazda 6 vs 2003 MG ZS Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZS

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 6SpecificationMG ZS
MazdaMakeMG
6ModelZS
2003Model year2003
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Mazda 6SpecificationMG ZS
9,9 s0–100 km/h9,5 s
202 km/hTop speed193 km/h
1999 ccEngine displacement1994 cc
141 HPPower113 HP
181 NmTorque260 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 6SpecificationMG ZS
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
64 ltFuel tank55 lt
11,8 ltUrban consumption7,8 lt
6,6 ltExtra-urban consumption4,3 lt
8,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 6SpecificationMG ZS
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15 VTyre size205/50 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 6SpecificationMG ZS
4700 mmLength4520 mm
1780 mmWidth1700 mm
1480 mmHeight1390 mm
1335 KgWeight1225 Kg
2675 mmWheelbase2620 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Mazda 6 and 2003 MG ZS approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZS leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…