DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Mazda 6 vs 2004 Alfa Romeo 156 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 6

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

54.25–53.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeAlfa Romeo
6Model156
2004Model year2004
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

11,2 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
192 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1798 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
120 HPPower120 HP
165 NmTorque146 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
64 ltFuel tank63 lt
11,7 ltUrban consumption11,4 lt
6,3 ltExtra-urban consumption6,4 lt
8,3 ltAverage consumption8,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15 HTyre size185/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4700 mmLength4435 mm
1780 mmWidth1743 mm
1480 mmHeight1430 mm
1335 KgWeight1265 Kg
2675 mmWheelbase2595 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Mazda 6 and 2004 Alfa Romeo 156 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 6 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…