DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Alfa Romeo 156 vs 2004 Mazda 6 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 6

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

53.5–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Alfa RomeoMakeMazda
156Model6
2004Model year2004
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

10,5 s0–100 km/h11,2 s
200 km/hTop speed192 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1798 cc
120 HPPower120 HP
146 NmTorque165 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
63 ltFuel tank64 lt
11,4 ltUrban consumption11,7 lt
6,4 ltExtra-urban consumption6,3 lt
8,2 ltAverage consumption8,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R15Tyre size195/65 R15 H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4435 mmLength4700 mm
1743 mmWidth1780 mm
1430 mmHeight1480 mm
1265 KgWeight1335 Kg
2595 mmWheelbase2675 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Alfa Romeo 156 and 2004 Mazda 6 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 6 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…