DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mazda 323 vs 2000 Renault Laguna Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Laguna

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

53.25–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeRenault
323ModelLaguna
2000Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

12,2 s0–100 km/h11,6 s
178 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
90 HPPower114 HP
220 NmTorque168 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank66 lt
6,4 ltUrban consumption13,1 lt
4,4 ltExtra-urban consumption6,7 lt
—Average consumption7,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
185/65 R14Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4200 mmLength4508 mm
1705 mmWidth1752 mm
1410 mmHeight1430 mm
1175 KgWeight1290 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2670 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mazda 323 and 2000 Renault Laguna approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Laguna leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…