DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Land Rover Freelander vs 2000 Mazda 323 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Land Rover Freelander

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

54.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeMazda
FreelanderModel323
2000Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

15,2 s0–100 km/h12,2 s
155 km/hTop speed178 km/h
1994 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
98 HPPower90 HP
210 NmTorque220 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
59 ltFuel tank55 lt
9,6 ltUrban consumption6,4 lt
6,7 ltExtra-urban consumption4,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/80 R15Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4380 mmLength4200 mm
1805 mmWidth1705 mm
1760 mmHeight1410 mm
1405 KgWeight1175 Kg
2560 mmWheelbase2610 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Land Rover Freelander and 2000 Mazda 323 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Land Rover Freelander leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…