DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Renault Scenic vs 2000 Mazda 323 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 323

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

52.5–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeMazda
ScenicModel323
2000Model year2000
MinivanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h12,2 s
0 km/hTop speed178 km/h
1870 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
90 HPPower90 HP
0 NmTorque220 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
0 ltFuel tank55 lt
7 ltUrban consumption6,4 lt
4,9 ltExtra-urban consumption4,4 lt
6,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size185/65 R14
—ABSYes

Dimensions

—Length4200 mm
—Width1705 mm
—Height1410 mm
1365 KgWeight1175 Kg
—Wheelbase2610 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Renault Scenic and 2000 Mazda 323 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 323 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…