DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Mazda 323 vs 2002 Saab 9-3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 323

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 323SpecificationSaab 9-3
MazdaMakeSaab
323Model9-3
2002Model year2002
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3/5

Performance

Mazda 323SpecificationSaab 9-3
12,2 s0–100 km/h11,0 s
187 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1985 cc
101 HPPower130 HP
230 NmTorque177 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 323SpecificationSaab 9-3
DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank68 lt
7,4 ltUrban consumption13,1 lt
4,9 ltExtra-urban consumption6,9 lt
5,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 323SpecificationSaab 9-3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/55 R15Tyre size185/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 323SpecificationSaab 9-3
4290 mmLength4629 mm
1705 mmWidth1711 mm
1420 mmHeight1428 mm
1195 KgWeight1295 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2605 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Mazda 323 and 2002 Saab 9-3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 323 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…