DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Nissan AD vs 2002 Mazda 323 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 323

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Nissan ADSpecificationMazda 323
NissanMakeMazda
ADModel323
2002Model year2002
EstateBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Nissan ADSpecificationMazda 323
—0–100 km/h12,2 s
0 km/hTop speed187 km/h
1769 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
105 HPPower101 HP
149 NmTorque230 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Nissan ADSpecificationMazda 323
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption7,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,9 lt
—Average consumption5,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Nissan ADSpecificationMazda 323
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
—Tyre size195/55 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Nissan ADSpecificationMazda 323
4370 mmLength4290 mm
1695 mmWidth1705 mm
1475 mmHeight1420 mm
1130 KgWeight1195 Kg
2535 mmWheelbase2610 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Nissan AD and 2002 Mazda 323 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 323 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…