DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Saab 9-3 vs 2002 Mazda 323 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 323

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Saab 9-3SpecificationMazda 323
SaabMakeMazda
9-3Model323
2002Model year2002
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3/5Doors5

Performance

Saab 9-3SpecificationMazda 323
11,0 s0–100 km/h12,2 s
200 km/hTop speed187 km/h
1985 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
130 HPPower101 HP
177 NmTorque230 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Saab 9-3SpecificationMazda 323
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
68 ltFuel tank55 lt
13,1 ltUrban consumption7,4 lt
6,9 ltExtra-urban consumption4,9 lt
—Average consumption5,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Saab 9-3SpecificationMazda 323
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R15Tyre size195/55 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Saab 9-3SpecificationMazda 323
4629 mmLength4290 mm
1711 mmWidth1705 mm
1428 mmHeight1420 mm
1295 KgWeight1195 Kg
2605 mmWheelbase2610 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Saab 9-3 and 2002 Mazda 323 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 323 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…