DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Mazda 323 vs 2002 Nissan AD Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 323

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 323SpecificationNissan AD
MazdaMakeNissan
323ModelAD
2002Model year2002
HatchbackBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Mazda 323SpecificationNissan AD
12,2 s0–100 km/h—
187 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1769 cc
101 HPPower105 HP
230 NmTorque149 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 323SpecificationNissan AD
DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank50 lt
7,4 ltUrban consumption—
4,9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 323SpecificationNissan AD
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
195/55 R15Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

Mazda 323SpecificationNissan AD
4290 mmLength4370 mm
1705 mmWidth1695 mm
1420 mmHeight1475 mm
1195 KgWeight1130 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2535 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Mazda 323 and 2002 Nissan AD approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 323 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…