DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Mazda 323 vs 1996 Mazda Bongo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 323

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.5–63.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeMazda
323ModelBongo
1996Model year1996
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats—
3Doors4

Performance

200 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1840 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
115 HPPower120 HP
157 NmTorque310 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank65 lt
8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears—
185/65 R14 HTyre size195/70 R15; 215/65 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

4035 mmLength4585 mm
1710 mmWidth1690 mm
1405 mmHeight1960 mm
1110 KgWeight—
2505 mmWheelbase2920 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Mazda 323 and 1996 Mazda Bongo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 323 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…