DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Mazda Bongo vs 1996 Mazda 323 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 323

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.75–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeMazda
BongoModel323
1996Model year1996
MinivanBody typeHatchback
—Seats5
4Doors3

Performance

0 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1840 cc
120 HPPower115 HP
310 NmTorque157 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Average consumption8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears5
195/70 R15; 215/65 R15Tyre size185/65 R14 H
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4585 mmLength4035 mm
1690 mmWidth1710 mm
1960 mmHeight1405 mm
—Weight1110 Kg
2920 mmWheelbase2505 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Mazda Bongo and 1996 Mazda 323 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 323 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…