DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mazda 323 vs 1999 Renault Kangoo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 323

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeRenault
323ModelKangoo
2000Model year1999
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats2
4Doors3

Performance

14,2 s0–100 km/h10,7 s
170 km/hTop speed160 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
95 HPPower95 HP
143 NmTorque148 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank50 lt
11,3 ltUrban consumption9,8 lt
7,1 ltExtra-urban consumption6,1 lt
8,6 ltAverage consumption7,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size175/65 R14 T
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4390 mmLength3995 mm
1705 mmWidth1663 mm
1410 mmHeight1827 mm
1115 KgWeight1135 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mazda 323 and 1999 Renault Kangoo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 323 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…