1999 • Ford
Mondeo
Ford Mondeo 1.6 16V (95 Hp) 1999Overall Score46.25/100
1999 Ford Mondeo vs 2000 Mazda 323 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Mazda
323
Mazda 323 1.6 i 16V (95 Hp) 2000Overall Score47.25/100
WINNER
Mazda 323
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford MondeoSpecificationMazda 323
FordMakeMazda
MondeoModel323
1999Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Ford MondeoSpecificationMazda 323
12,7 s0–100 km/h14,2 s
185 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1597 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
95 HPPower95 HP
142 NmTorque143 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford MondeoSpecificationMazda 323
PetrolFuel typePetrol
61 ltFuel tank55 lt
10,7 ltUrban consumption11,3 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption7,1 lt
—Average consumption8,6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford MondeoSpecificationMazda 323
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
185/65 R14Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford MondeoSpecificationMazda 323
4556 mmLength4390 mm
1751 mmWidth1705 mm
1424 mmHeight1410 mm
1240 KgWeight1115 Kg
2704 mmWheelbase2610 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1999 Ford Mondeo and 2000 Mazda 323 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda 323 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…