DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Renault Kangoo vs 2000 Mazda 323 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 323

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeMazda
KangooModel323
1999Model year2000
MinivanBody typeSedan
2Seats5
3Doors4

Performance

10,7 s0–100 km/h14,2 s
160 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
95 HPPower95 HP
148 NmTorque143 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank55 lt
9,8 ltUrban consumption11,3 lt
6,1 ltExtra-urban consumption7,1 lt
7,5 ltAverage consumption8,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
175/65 R14 TTyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3995 mmLength4390 mm
1663 mmWidth1705 mm
1827 mmHeight1410 mm
1135 KgWeight1115 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase2610 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Renault Kangoo and 2000 Mazda 323 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 323 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…