DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mazda 323 vs 2000 Opel Astra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 323

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 323SpecificationOpel Astra
MazdaMakeOpel
323ModelAstra
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3/5

Performance

Mazda 323SpecificationOpel Astra
14,2 s0–100 km/h15,5 s
170 km/hTop speed165 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1686 cc
95 HPPower75 HP
143 NmTorque165 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 323SpecificationOpel Astra
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank52 lt
11,3 ltUrban consumption6,1 lt
7,1 ltExtra-urban consumption4 lt
8,6 ltAverage consumption4,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 323SpecificationOpel Astra
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size185/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 323SpecificationOpel Astra
4390 mmLength4110 mm
1705 mmWidth1709 mm
1410 mmHeight1425 mm
1115 KgWeight1185 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2606 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mazda 323 and 2000 Opel Astra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 323 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…