2000 • Mazda
323
Mazda 323 1.6 i 16V (95 Hp) 2000Overall Score47.25/100
2000 Mazda 323 vs 1999 Ford Mondeo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1999 • Ford
Mondeo
Ford Mondeo 1.6 16V (95 Hp) 1999Overall Score46.25/100
WINNER
Mazda 323
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda 323SpecificationFord Mondeo
MazdaMakeFord
323ModelMondeo
2000Model year1999
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Mazda 323SpecificationFord Mondeo
14,2 s0–100 km/h12,7 s
170 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1597 cc
95 HPPower95 HP
143 NmTorque142 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda 323SpecificationFord Mondeo
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank61 lt
11,3 ltUrban consumption10,7 lt
7,1 ltExtra-urban consumption5,8 lt
8,6 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda 323SpecificationFord Mondeo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda 323SpecificationFord Mondeo
4390 mmLength4556 mm
1705 mmWidth1751 mm
1410 mmHeight1424 mm
1115 KgWeight1240 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2704 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Mazda 323 and 1999 Ford Mondeo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda 323 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…