DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Mazda 3 vs 2004 Toyota Mark II Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

82.5–81.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeToyota
3ModelMark II
2006Model year2004
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

6,1 s0–100 km/h—
250 km/hTop speed230 km/h
2261 ccEngine displacement2492 cc
260 HPPower280 HP
380 NmTorque378 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank70 lt
13,5 ltUrban consumption20 lt
7,5 ltExtra-urban consumption12 lt
9,7 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears5
215/45 R18Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4435 mmLength4735 mm
1765 mmWidth1760 mm
1465 mmHeight1460 mm
1410 KgWeight1570 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2780 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Mazda 3 and 2004 Toyota Mark II approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…