DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Jaguar XJ vs 2006 Mazda 3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

81.75–82.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Jaguar XJSpecificationMazda 3
JaguarMakeMazda
XJModel3
2006Model year2006
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

Jaguar XJSpecificationMazda 3
8,2 s0–100 km/h6,1 s
222 km/hTop speed250 km/h
2722 ccEngine displacement2261 cc
207 HPPower260 HP
435 NmTorque380 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Jaguar XJSpecificationMazda 3
DieselFuel typePetrol
85 ltFuel tank55 lt
10,8 ltUrban consumption13,5 lt
6,5 ltExtra-urban consumption7,5 lt
—Average consumption9,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Jaguar XJSpecificationMazda 3
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
235/55 R17Tyre size215/45 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Jaguar XJSpecificationMazda 3
5090 mmLength4435 mm
1860 mmWidth1765 mm
1448 mmHeight1465 mm
1657 KgWeight1410 Kg
3034 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Jaguar XJ and 2006 Mazda 3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…