DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Toyota Mark II vs 2006 Mazda 3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

81.75–82.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeMazda
Mark IIModel3
2004Model year2006
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h6,1 s
230 km/hTop speed250 km/h
2492 ccEngine displacement2261 cc
280 HPPower260 HP
378 NmTorque380 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank55 lt
20 ltUrban consumption13,5 lt
12 ltExtra-urban consumption7,5 lt
—Average consumption9,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
195/65 R15Tyre size215/45 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4735 mmLength4435 mm
1760 mmWidth1765 mm
1460 mmHeight1465 mm
1570 KgWeight1410 Kg
2780 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Toyota Mark II and 2006 Mazda 3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…