DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Mazda 3 vs 2004 Nissan Gloria Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

82.5–81.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeNissan
3ModelGloria
2006Model year2004
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

6,1 s0–100 km/h—
250 km/hTop speed210 km/h
2261 ccEngine displacement2498 cc
260 HPPower260 HP
380 NmTorque324 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank80 lt
13,5 ltUrban consumption18 lt
7,5 ltExtra-urban consumption10 lt
9,7 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears4
215/45 R18Tyre size215/55 R16 V
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4435 mmLength4865 mm
1765 mmWidth1770 mm
1465 mmHeight1465 mm
1410 KgWeight1710 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2800 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Mazda 3 and 2004 Nissan Gloria approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…