DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Mazda 3 vs 2006 Jaguar XJ Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

82.5–81.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 3SpecificationJaguar XJ
MazdaMakeJaguar
3ModelXJ
2006Model year2006
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Mazda 3SpecificationJaguar XJ
6,1 s0–100 km/h8,2 s
250 km/hTop speed222 km/h
2261 ccEngine displacement2722 cc
260 HPPower207 HP
380 NmTorque435 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 3SpecificationJaguar XJ
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank85 lt
13,5 ltUrban consumption10,8 lt
7,5 ltExtra-urban consumption6,5 lt
9,7 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 3SpecificationJaguar XJ
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
215/45 R18Tyre size235/55 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 3SpecificationJaguar XJ
4435 mmLength5090 mm
1765 mmWidth1860 mm
1465 mmHeight1448 mm
1410 KgWeight1657 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase3034 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Mazda 3 and 2006 Jaguar XJ approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…