2013 • Mazda
3
Mazda 3 2.0 SkyActiv-G (120 Hp) 2013Overall Score63.25/100
2013 Mazda 3 vs 2013 Great Wall Hover H6 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2013 • Great Wall
Hover H6
Great Wall Hover H6 Hover 2.0 (143 Hp) 2013Overall Score62.5/100
WINNER
Mazda 3
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda 3SpecificationGreat Wall Hover H6
MazdaMakeGreat Wall
3ModelHover H6
2013Model year2013
HatchbackBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Mazda 3SpecificationGreat Wall Hover H6
8,9 s0–100 km/h11,2 s
195 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1996 cc
120 HPPower143 HP
210 NmTorque310 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda 3SpecificationGreat Wall Hover H6
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
51 ltFuel tank58 lt
6,5 ltUrban consumption—
4,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,1 ltAverage consumption6,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda 3SpecificationGreat Wall Hover H6
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
205/60 R16Tyre size225/65 R17
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda 3SpecificationGreat Wall Hover H6
4460 mmLength4640 mm
1795 mmWidth1825 mm
1450 mmHeight1745 mm
1205 KgWeight—
2700 mmWheelbase2680 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2013 Mazda 3 and 2013 Great Wall Hover H6 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…