DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 SsangYong Chairman vs 2012 Mazda 3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

SsangYong Chairman

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SsangYongMakeMazda
ChairmanModel3
2012Model year2012
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

11,6 s0–100 km/h10,4 s
197 km/hTop speed206 km/h
2295 ccEngine displacement1999 cc
150 HPPower150 HP
220 NmTorque191 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank55 lt
15,3 ltUrban consumption9,1 lt
9,1 ltExtra-urban consumption5,3 lt
—Average consumption6,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
215/60 R16Tyre size205/50 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5055 mmLength4460 mm
1825 mmWidth1755 mm
1465 mmHeight1470 mm
1700 KgWeight1280 Kg
2900 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 SsangYong Chairman and 2012 Mazda 3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, SsangYong Chairman leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…