2012 • Mazda
CX-5
Mazda CX-5 2.0 (160 Hp) 2012Overall Score63.25/100
2012 Mazda CX-5 vs 2012 Mazda 3 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2012 • Mazda
3
Mazda 3 2.0 DISI (150 Hp) 2012Overall Score62.5/100
WINNER
Mazda CX-5
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda CX-5SpecificationMazda 3
MazdaMakeMazda
CX-5Model3
2012Model year2012
SUVBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Mazda CX-5SpecificationMazda 3
10,5 s0–100 km/h10,4 s
197 km/hTop speed206 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1999 cc
160 HPPower150 HP
208 NmTorque191 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda CX-5SpecificationMazda 3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
58 ltFuel tank55 lt
8,1 ltUrban consumption9,1 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption5,3 lt
6,6 ltAverage consumption6,7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Mazda CX-5SpecificationMazda 3
4555 mmLength4460 mm
1840 mmWidth1755 mm
1710 mmHeight1470 mm
1488 KgWeight1280 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2640 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 Mazda CX-5 and 2012 Mazda 3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda CX-5 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSImage unavailableMazda 6 vs Mazda CX-52012 and 2012 model yearsVSImage unavailableMazda 3 vs Mazda CX-52012 and 2012 model years
VSImage unavailableVolkswagen Scirocco vs Mazda CX-52012 and 2012 model years
VSImage unavailableSubaru Forester vs Mazda CX-52012 and 2012 model years
VSImage unavailableFord Mondeo vs Mazda CX-52012 and 2012 model yearsComments are loading…