DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Mazda 3 vs 2012 SsangYong Chairman Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

SsangYong Chairman

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeSsangYong
3ModelChairman
2012Model year2012
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

10,4 s0–100 km/h11,6 s
206 km/hTop speed197 km/h
1999 ccEngine displacement2295 cc
150 HPPower150 HP
191 NmTorque220 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank80 lt
9,1 ltUrban consumption15,3 lt
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption9,1 lt
6,7 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears5
205/50 R17Tyre size215/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4460 mmLength5055 mm
1755 mmWidth1825 mm
1470 mmHeight1465 mm
1280 KgWeight1700 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2900 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Mazda 3 and 2012 SsangYong Chairman approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, SsangYong Chairman leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…